Why the study?
To review the emergence and contemporary role of conduction system pacing in patients requiring permanent cardiac pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights the emergence and promising clinical role of conduction system pacing (HBP and LBBP) as an alternative to conventional pacing to achieve more synchronous ventricular contraction.
His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) are novel methods of pacing directly pacing the cardiac conduction system. HBP while developed more than two decades ago, only recently moved into the clinical mainstream. In contrast to conventional cardiac pacing, conduction system pacing including HBP and LBBP utilizes the native electrical system of the heart to rapidly disseminate the electrical impulse and generate a more synchronous ventricular contraction. Widespread adoption of conduction system pacing has resulted in a wealth of observational data, registries, and some early randomized controlled clinical trials. While much remains to be learned about conduction system pacing and its role in electrophysiology, data available thus far is very promising. In this review of conduction system pacing, the authors review the emergence of conduction system pacing and its contemporary role in patients requiring permanent cardiac pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beer et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: