Why the study?
Does plasma NT-proBNP level correlate with disease severity and clinical symptoms in patients with chronic rheumatic valve disease?
Does plasma NT-proBNP level correlate with disease severity and clinical symptoms in patients with chronic rheumatic valve disease?
Plasma NT-proBNP serves as a useful noninvasive biomarker that correlates with clinical symptoms and echocardiographic severity in patients with chronic rheumatic valve disease.
May aid noninvasive assessment in rheumatic mitral stenosis; leaves open prognostic utility pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: A noninvasive marker of disease severity and presence of symptoms is required in patients with chronic rheumatic valve disease (RVD). AIMS: We sought to test the utility of measuring of N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in chronic phase RVD. We also evaluated whether echocardiographic measures are interrelated with NT-proBNP levels. METHODS: The study comprised 92 patients with RVD (mean age of 40+/-14 years) and 50 age/gender-matched control subjects. Functional status was assessed. Detailed echocardiographic examination was performed and mitral valve score was estimated. Venous blood samples were taken for measuring the level of NT-proBNP. RESULTS: The plasma levels of NT-proBNP rose with increasing severity of mitral valve stenosis (p<0.001), increasing severity of mitral valve score (p<0.001), increasing severity of clinical symptom (p<0.001), increasing severity of mitral regurgitation (p<0.013), presence of mitral valve calcification (p<0.001), presence of tricuspid valve stenosis (p<0.001), increasing severity of tricuspid regurgitation (p<0.011), presence of aortic stenosis (p=0.043), decreasing left ventricular ejection fraction (p<0.001), presence of left atrial thrombus (p=0.0019), and with increasing left atrium dimensions (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP levels in patients with chronic RVD are a potential marker of disease severity and correlates with symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davutoğlu et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: