Key result
Clinical, biochemical, and hemodynamic predictors guide prognosis and optimize treatment strategies in HFpEF.
Why the study?
There are no reliable prognostic algorithms to identify high-risk HFpEF patients, and independent predictors of poor prognosis are needed to guide individual treatment.
This review highlights the importance of clinical, biochemical, and hemodynamic predictors in determining the prognosis and guiding personalized treatment for patients with HFpEF.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common form of heart failure (HF) worldwide and is characterized by a severe course, poor prognosis, and limited effective treatments. To date, there are no reliable prognostic algorithms to identify high-risk patients, and prognostic significance has been determined only for generally accepted clinical and standard resting echocardiographic parameters. The discovery of independent predictors of poor prognosis/severe course of HFpEF is important for determining individual treatment tactics for such patients.The article provides a review of studies devoted to determining clinical, biochemical and hemodynamic predictors of unfavorable progression and prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Significance of assessing of these predictors for determining prognosis and choosing optimal treatment for patients with HFpEF is shown. Directions for further research were identified: identifying phenotypes of HFpEF, developing personalized therapy, construction of prognostic models to identify high-risk patients who require more careful monitoring and/or more intensive drug treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sobolevskaya et al. (2024) conducted a review in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Clinical, biochemical, and hemodynamic predictors was evaluated on Unfavorable progression and prognosis. Clinical, biochemical, and hemodynamic predictors are essential for determining prognosis and guiding optimal treatment strategies in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: