Why the study?
Does remote ischemic preconditioning reduce myocardial injury in elderly patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus undergoing elective drug-eluting stent implantation?
Does remote ischemic preconditioning reduce myocardial injury in elderly patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus undergoing elective drug-eluting stent implantation?
Remote ischemic preconditioning before elective PCI does not significantly reduce periprocedural myocardial injury in elderly patients with diabetes.
RIPC does not reduce periprocedural myocardial injury in elderly diabetics undergoing elective PCI; confirms neutral effect in this high-risk subgroup.
There is conflicting evidence regarding the effectiveness of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, we prospectively enrolled elderly patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing elective drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. They were randomized to receive RIPC within 2 hours before PCI (n = 102) or not (controls, n = 98). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Despite a trend toward decline, the median high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hscTnI) level (P = .256) and the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) type 4a (P = .106) in the RIPC group 16 hours after PCI procedure was not significantly different from the control group. The RIPC could attenuate the release of a myocardial biomarker but failed to show a significant effect on hscTnI level or MI type 4a incidence after PCI procedure in elderly patients with CHD having DM undergoing elective DES implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: