Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Using two case studies under the Christian-conservative Orbán government, this essay explores how ‘future memories’ are being constructed and sustained by revisionist history writing about the history of communism, especially in instrumentalist memories using pedagogical instruments: the secondary literature curriculum and the Museum of Trianon. It argues that canonization revised by counter canonization is necessarily opening space for revisionism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrea Pető (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: