Key result
Severe mitral regurgitation (HR 7.11), severe diastolic dysfunction (HR 4.63), and ejection fraction <30% (HR 3.10) at 1 year after cardiac resynchronization therapy independently predicted increased risk of cardiac death or transplantation.
Why the study?
Do echocardiographic parameters (EF < 30%, severe diastolic dysfunction, severe mitral regurgitation) at 6-12 months predict cardiac death or transplantation in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Observational (n=116)
No
Do echocardiographic parameters (EF < 30%, severe diastolic dysfunction, severe mitral regurgitation) at 6-12 months predict cardiac death or transplantation in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Effect estimate: HR 7.11 (95% CI 2.26-22.35)
p-value: p=0.001
Ejection fraction < 30%, severe diastolic dysfunction, and severe mitral regurgitation at 6-12 months post-CRT are strong independent predictors of cardiac death or transplantation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is the recommended treatment by leading global guidelines. However, 30%-40% of selected patients are non-responders. OBJECTIVE: To develop an echocardiographic model to predict cardiac death or transplantation (Tx) 1 year after CRT. METHOD: Observational, prospective study, with the inclusion of 116 patients, aged 64.89 ± 11.18 years, 69.8% male, 68,1% in NYHA FC III and 31,9% in FC IV, 71.55% with left bundle-branch block, and median ejection fraction (EF) of 29%. Evaluations were made in the pre‑implantation period and 6-12 months after that, and correlated with cardiac mortality/Tx at the end of follow-up. Cox and logistic regression analyses were performed with ROC and Kaplan-Meier curves. The model was internally validated by bootstrapping. RESULTS: There were 29 (25%) deaths/Tx during follow-up of 34.09 ± 17.9 months. Cardiac mortality/Tx was 16.3%. In the multivariate Cox model, EF < 30%, grade III/IV diastolic dysfunction and grade III mitral regurgitation at 6‑12 months were independently related to increased cardiac mortality or Tx, with hazard ratios of 3.1, 4.63 and 7.11, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.78. CONCLUSION: EF lower than 30%, severe diastolic dysfunction and severe mitral regurgitation indicate poor prognosis 1 year after CRT. The combination of two of those variables indicate the need for other treatment options.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocha et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Heart Failure (n=116). Echocardiographic predictors (severe mitral regurgitation, severe diastolic dysfunction, EF < 30%) vs. Absence of predictors was evaluated on Cardiac death or transplantation (HR 7.11, 95% CI 2.26-22.35, p=0.001). Severe mitral regurgitation (HR 7.11), severe diastolic dysfunction (HR 4.63), and ejection fraction <30% (HR 3.10) at 1 year after cardiac resynchronization therapy independently predicted increased risk of cardiac death or transplantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: