Key result
Strauss LBBB criteria predict ~590% higher odds of a positive hemodynamic response to CRT.
Why the study?
To analyze clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic factors in CHF patients with different hemodynamic responses to CRT to assess their use in predicting positive CRT response.
Cohort (n=136)
No
Effect estimate: OR 6.896 (95% CI 1.310-36.307)
p-value: p=0.023
A multivariate prognostic model incorporating history of valvular insufficiency correction, QRS duration, and Strauss LBBB criteria can help predict positive hemodynamic response to CRT in patients with HFrEF.
May aid CRT response prediction in HFrEF; leaves open prospective validation before changing selection.
AIM: This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic factors in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with different hemodynamic responses to cardiac resynchronization (CRT) to assess the possibility of their use in predicting the positive effect of CRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 136 patients with New York Heart Association grade 34 CHF with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35%, QRS duration of 150 ms, QRS duration of 130149 ms, and QRS morphology of left bundle branch block (LBBB). For CHF treatment and primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, a cardioverter-defibrillator with CRT (CRT-D) function was implanted. The enrolled patients were followed up prospectively for 1 year to record the endpoint, namely, hemodynamic response to CRT, assessed by a decrease in the end-systolic volume of the left ventricle by 15%. RESULTS: During the 1-year follow-up, the primary endpoint was registered in 62 (46%) patients. With a one-way logistic regression, four indicators with the highest predictive potential (p 0.05) and associated with the occurrence of the studied endpoint were identified. Based on the results of the multivariate regression analysis, a prognostic model was developed, which included three factors with the highest levels of statistical significance, namely, a history of indications of a previous correction of valvular insufficiency, QRS duration, and LBBB criteria according to Strauss. The diagnostic efficiency of the model was 73% (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 68%). The electrocardiographic parameters of the Strauss LBBB criteria and QRS duration were independent predictors of the studied endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: The developed multivariate prognostic model may be useful in the selection of patients with CHF reduced ejection fraction for implantation of devices with CRT function; the lack of external validation limits its application in practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Нечепуренко et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=136). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) was evaluated on Hemodynamic response to CRT (decrease in LV end-systolic volume ≥ 15%) (OR 6.896, 95% CI 1.310-36.307, p=0.023). The presence of Strauss left bundle branch block criteria independently predicted a positive hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (OR 6.896) in patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: