Key result
Diagnostic evaluation of unexplained dyspnea with low NT-proBNP identifies isolated deconditioning in ~47% of patients.
Why the study?
Unexplained exertional dyspnoea without significant elevation of natriuretic peptides is common, and one of the potential causes might be early heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
What are the underlying causes of unexplained exertional dyspnoea in patients with normal ejection fraction and low natriuretic peptides?
Observational (n=66)
What are the underlying causes of unexplained exertional dyspnoea in patients with normal ejection fraction and low natriuretic peptides?
In patients with unexplained exertional dyspnoea and low natriuretic peptides, exercise testing reveals HFpEF in 16.7% and deconditioning in 47%, highlighting the value of exercise echocardiography and CPX.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exercise testing may identify causes of unexplained dyspnoea despite low NT-proBNP; leaves open optimal diagnostic algorithms in prospective cohorts.
Background Unexplained exertional dyspnoea without significant elevation of natriuretic peptides is common. One of the causes might be early heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Aims This study aimed to characterize patients with exertional dyspnoea and normal/near-to-normal N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels with regard to early stages of HFpEF and non-cardiac causes. Method and Results Sixty-six patients (age 62 ± 7 years old, 85% women) with dyspnoea assessed using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) questionnaire and NT-proBNP level of <125 pg/mL for patients <75 years old or <300 pg/mL for patients >75 years old were recruited. Patients with known significant heart disease, lung disease (abnormal respiratory function tests) or renal insufficiency stage ≥ 4 were excluded. In 11 patients (16.7%), HFpEF was confirmed according to the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association (ESC HFA) criteria, 31 patients (47%) presented isolated deconditioning and 5 patients (7.6%) had idiopathic hyperventilation. In the remaining 19 patients (28.8%) with normal echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX), no objective cause of dyspnoea could be found. Compared with patients without HFpEF, those with HFpEF were older, more often hypertensive and diabetic, with higher NT-proBNP levels. They had higher E/e′ ratios during exercise echocardiography and lower volume of oxygen uptake (VO2) peaks and steeper minute ventilation (VE)/volume of carbon dioxide produced (VCO2) slopes during CPX. Psychological impact measured on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire was less important in HFpEF patients than in other patients. Conclusions The most common causes of unexplained exertional dyspnoea in patients without significant elevation of natriuretic peptides are peripheral deconditioning, HFpEF and hyperventilation. Studying patients during exercise allows for getting more data about pathophysiology and improving patient phenotyping and management. Early unmasking of HFpEF using exercise echocardiography and/or CPX and initiation of treatment could prevent hospitalizations for acute heart failure. Although using exercise testing, many patients could not be classified according to their diagnosis, and this reinforces the need to better define exercise diagnostic criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berthelot et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Unexplained exertional dyspnoea (n=66). Diagnostic evaluation (exercise echocardiography and CPX) was evaluated on Causes of unexplained exertional dyspnoea. Diagnostic evaluation of patients with unexplained dyspnoea and low NT-proBNP identified isolated deconditioning (47%), HFpEF (16.7%), idiopathic hyperventilation (7.6%), and no cause (28.8%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: