Current use of universal reference intervals for cardiac biomarkers like troponin and CK-MB leads to under-diagnosis of myocardial necrosis in women, highlighting the need for sex-specific thresholds.
Since 1984, each year, more women than men die of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and heart failure (HF), yet more men are diagnosed. Because biomarker assessment is often the first diagnostic employed in such patients, understanding biomarker differences in men vs. women may improve female morbidity and mortality rates.Some key examples of cardiac biomarker utility based on sex include contemporary use of "unisex" troponin reference intervals under-diagnosing myocardial necrosis in women; greater use of hsCRP in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) could lead to better stratification in women; and greater use of BNP with sex-specific thresholds in ACS could also lead to more timely risk stratification in women.Accurate diagnosis, appropriate risk management, and monitoring are key in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases; however, the assessment tools used must also be useful or at least assessed for utility in both sexes. In other words, going forward, we need to evaluate sex-specific reference intervals or cutoffs for laboratory tests used to assess cardiovascular disease to help close the diagnostic gap between men and women.
Sobhani et al. (2018) conducted a review in Ischemic heart disease and heart failure. Current use of universal reference intervals for cardiac biomarkers like troponin and CK-MB leads to under-diagnosis of myocardial necrosis in women, highlighting the need for sex-specific thresholds.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: