Key result
Circumferential radiofrequency ablation using a pure anatomic approach prevented atrial fibrillation recurrence in 80.4% of patients, suggesting complete pulmonary vein isolation is not crucial.
Why the study?
Does circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia using an anatomic approach prevent atrial arrhythmias in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=51)
Does circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia using an anatomic approach prevent atrial arrhythmias in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation?
An anatomic approach to circumferential radiofrequency ablation prevents AF recurrence in over 80% of patients, suggesting that complete electrical isolation of pulmonary veins may not be strictly necessary for clinical success.
Anatomic ablation may suffice without confirmed isolation; challenges PVI consensus yet remains hypothesis-generating pending RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary veins (PVs) play a pivotal role in initiating and perpetuating atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated if PV electrical isolation from the left atrium is required for curing AF. METHODS AND RESULT: Fifty-one patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent circumferential radiofrequency ablation of PV ostia performed with an anatomic approach. The end point of the ablation procedure was the recording of low peak-to-peak bipolar potentials (<0.1 mV) inside the lesions. Left atrium pacing was used to assess the conduction between the PVs and the left atrium. During a mean follow-up period of 16.6+/-3.9 months, 41 patients (80.4%) were free of atrial arrhythmias. When patients with and without AF recurrence were analyzed, no significant difference was observed in the mean number of PVs in which the ablation end point was reached (3.4+/-1.2 versus 3.7+/-0.87) and PVs isolated (1.5+/-1.4 versus 1.6+/-1). We noted that, although in 29 of 41 patients (71%) without AF recurrence, the ablation end point was reached in all PVs mapped, it was only possible to demonstrate the isolation of all PVs mapped in 2 patients. On the other hand, in 7 of 10 patients (70%) with AF recurrence, the ablation end point was reached in all PVs mapped, whereas one patient had all PVs isolated. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that with the use of a pure anatomic approach, it is possible to prevent AF in >80% of patients undergoing catheter ablation. Moreover, the isolation of PVs is not crucial for curing AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stabile et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (n=51). Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia (anatomic approach) was evaluated on Freedom from atrial arrhythmias. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation using a pure anatomic approach prevented atrial fibrillation recurrence in 80.4% of patients, suggesting complete pulmonary vein isolation is not crucial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: