Key result
PiCSO use during ACS and high-risk PCI appears safe with 100% survival at six months.
Why the study?
STEMI mortality has plateaued over the last decade, but previous studies using PiCSO during primary angioplasty showed a modest but significant reduction of the infarct zone in anterior STEMI.
Is the use of the PiCSO device safe and feasible during primary angioplasty or high-risk PCI in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=22)
Yes
Is the use of the PiCSO device safe and feasible during primary angioplasty or high-risk PCI in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
The use of the PiCSO device during primary angioplasty or high-risk PCI appears safe and feasible, with excellent short-term survival and symptom improvement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports PiCSO safety in ACS PCI; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized trials before practice change.
Objectives: The mortality of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has plateaued in the last decade, with a 30‐day mortality of 3%‐4%. Previous studies in patients with anterior STEMI treated by primary angioplasty and assisted with the pressure‐controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion (PiCSO) system have shown a modest but significant absolute reduction of the infarct zone. Methods: Prospective, observational study were carried out in two hospitals in Spain. The study included patients with acute coronary syndrome and patients with high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PiCSO therapy was provided throughout the PCI (after achieving thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] flow two or three in STEMI cases), with a minimum duration of 20 min from stent implantation until the completion of the procedure. Results: A total of 22 cases were performed. In 20 cases, PiCSO therapy could be successfully applied, and in 2 cases, it was not possible due to the inability to access the coronary sinus. In 95.45%, the PCI was performed in a single coronary artery. Baseline TIMI flow was 0‐1 in > 60% of patients, with final TIMI 3 flow achieved in > 95%. There were no complications secondary to the use of the PiCSO system. At 6‐month clinical follow‐up, 100% of the patients were alive with significant improvement in functional class and angina status. Conclusions: The use of the PiCSO device during ACS was safe and may offer potential benefits to patients susceptible to reperfusion injury or in whom relevant distal microembolization is anticipated during primary angioplasty or high‐risk PCI. More data are needed to validate its widespread clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maldonado et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (n=22). Pressure-controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion (PiCSO) system was evaluated on 6-month survival. The use of the PiCSO device during acute coronary syndrome and high-risk PCI was safe, with 100% of patients alive at 6 months and no complications secondary to the system.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: