Key result
Implantable devices and catheter ablation improve survival and symptoms over medical therapy in select HFrEF patients.
Why the study?
Despite neurohormonal antagonists and antiarrhythmic drug therapy, rate and rhythm control in HF remains suboptimal and mortality remains high, prompting an evaluation of implantable devices and catheter ablation.
Do implantable devices and catheter ablation improve outcomes in patients with HFrEF compared to pharmacological therapy?
Do implantable devices and catheter ablation improve outcomes in patients with HFrEF compared to pharmacological therapy?
This comprehensive review highlights the integral role and superior efficacy of implantable devices and catheter ablation over pharmacological therapy in managing select patients with HFrEF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Affirms device and ablation benefits in select HFrEF; leaves open optimal selection and integration pending prospective data.
Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome characterised by significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Evidence-based therapies for the management of HF include several well-established neurohormonal antagonists and antiarrhythmic drug therapy to mitigate the onset of cardiac arrhythmia. However, the degree of rate and rhythm control achieved is often suboptimal and mortality rates continue to remain high. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), cardiac resynchronization (CRT), and combined (CRT-D) therapies have emerged as integral and rapidly expanding technologies in the management of select patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). ICDs treat ventricular arrhythmia and are used as primary prophylaxis for sudden cardiac death, while CRT resynchronizes ventricular contraction to improve left ventricular systolic function. Left ventricular assist device therapy has also been shown to provide clinically meaningful survival benefits in patients with advanced HF, and His-bundle pacing has more recently emerged as a safe, viable, and promising pacing modality for patients with CRT indication. Catheter ablation is another important and well-established strategy for managing cardiac arrhythmia in HF, demonstrating superior efficacy when compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone. In this article, we provide a comprehensive and in-depth evaluation of the role of implantable devices and catheter ablation in patients with HFrEF, outlining current applications, recent advances, and future directions in practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sohrabi et al. (2021) conducted a review in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Implantable devices (ICD, CRT, LVAD) and catheter ablation vs. Pharmacological therapy was evaluated. Implantable devices and catheter ablation provide significant survival and symptomatic benefits compared to pharmacological therapy in select patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: