Key result
Sex differences in perivascular adipose tissue underlie distinct vascular abnormalities in cardiometabolic diseases.
Why the study?
Increasing evidence reveals sex differences in perivascular adipose tissue morphology, vascular modulation, and dysfunction mechanisms, highlighting sex-specific mechanisms as evolving targets for cardiovascular protection.
Targeting sex-specific mechanisms of perivascular adipose tissue dysfunction represents an evolving strategy for cardiovascular protection in cardiometabolic diseases.
May inform sex-specific vascular protection strategies in cardiometabolic disease; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
In addition to the endothelium, the perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) has been described to be involved in the local modulation of vascular function by synthetizing and releasing vasoactive factors. Under physiological conditions, PVAT has anticontractile and anti-inflammatory effects. However, in the context of hypertension, obesity and type 2 diabetes, the PVAT pattern of anticontractile adipokines is altered, favoring oxidative stress, inflammation and, consequently, vascular dysfunction. Therefore, dysfunctional PVAT has become a target for therapeutic intervention in cardiometabolic diseases. An increasing number of studies have revealed sex differences in PVAT morphology and in the modulatory effects of PVAT on endothelial function and vascular tone. Moreover, distinct mechanisms underlying PVAT dysfunction may account for vascular abnormalities in males and females. Therefore, targeting sex-specific mechanisms of PVAT dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases is an evolving strategy for cardiovascular protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victório et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cardiometabolic diseases. Sex differences in perivascular adipose tissue morphology and function contribute to distinct mechanisms of vascular abnormalities in males and females with cardiometabolic diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: