Key result
In a patient with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac resynchronization therapy rapidly reduced the ventricular arrhythmia burden from 19% to 0.2% within three days of initiation.
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy rapidly reduce ventricular arrhythmia burden in a patient with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy and refractory heart failure?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy rapidly reduce ventricular arrhythmia burden in a patient with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy and refractory heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.2% vs 19%
Cardiac resynchronization therapy may provide a rapid and potent antiarrhythmic effect in selected patients with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy and a high ventricular arrhythmia burden.
Suggests possible rapid antiarrhythmic effect of CRT in advanced DCM; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
We report a case demonstrating a rapid and potent antiarrhythmic effect of biventricular pacing. A 67-year-old male patient with dilated cardiomyopathy was admitted for heart failure. The initial surface electrocardiogram revealed a left bundle branch block with a QRS complex duration of 200 ms. Echocardiographic examination revealed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 16%, a left ventricular end-diastolic dimension of 91 mm, and marked interventricular dyssynchrony. Continuous rhythm monitoring revealed frequently-recurring non-sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Polymorphic VT, which persisted for 27 seconds, occurred on the third day after admission, and the R on T phenomenon recurred every two to three days thereafter. Optimal medical therapy for four weeks failed to suppress the recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias or ameliorate heart failure. Cardiac resynchronization therapy was initiated for an anticipated antiarrhythmic effect of biventricular pacing. Three days after the initiation of biventricular pacing, the ventricular arrhythmias disappeared almost completely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeon et al. (2017) conducted a case report in Advanced dilated cardiomyopathy with large ventricular arrhythmia burden (n=1). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs. Optimal medical therapy (baseline) was evaluated on Ventricular arrhythmia burden (% of total daily beats). In a patient with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy, cardiac resynchronization therapy rapidly reduced the ventricular arrhythmia burden from 19% to 0.2% within three days of initiation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: