Key result
Robot-assisted epicardial microwave ablation decreased AF duration from 6.6 s to 1.3 s after incomplete isolation (P=0.03) and 1.6 s after complete isolation (P=0.04).
Why the study?
Does robot-assisted epicardial microwave ablation reduce AF duration and increase AF cycle length in a canine model?
Does robot-assisted epicardial microwave ablation reduce AF duration and increase AF cycle length in a canine model?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.6% vs 6.6%
p-value: p=0.04
Epicardial PV isolation can be successfully performed by a single-sided robot-assisted approach, and while incomplete isolation decreases AF duration, complete isolation is necessary to prevent AF induction.
Hypothesis-generating in canine model; leaves open whether robot-assisted epicardial ablation improves human AF outcomes.
AIMS: To study the feasibility and electrophysiological efficacy of minimally invasive beating heart ablation of the pulmonary veins (PVs) via a robot-assisted single-sided approach. BACKGROUND: PV isolation by minimally invasive epicardial ablation may offer a new treatment for patients with lone atrial fibrillation (AF). However, complete PV isolation has been shown to be difficult to obtain. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 14 mongrel dogs, robot-assisted epicardial microwave ablation was performed on the beating heart by a single-sided right chest approach. Isolation of all PVs was performed in two steps to study the effect of an incomplete and a complete isolation on AF. AF was studied by random and burst pacing. Incremental pacing was performed to study conduction characteristics across the lesions. Opening of the pericardial reflections, introduction of the catheter and ablation were robotically feasible by a single-sided approach in 11 dogs. The AF duration decreased from 6.6+/-4.1 to 1.3+/-0.8 s (P=0.03) and 1.6+/-1.6 s (P=0.04 compared with control) after incomplete and completed isolation of the PVs. The AF cycle length increased from 134+/-5 to 141+/-5 and 145+/-8 ms (P=0.03) after incomplete and complete isolation, respectively. Several incomplete lesions showed 2:1 exit and/or entrance block during incremental pacing. After complete isolation, AF was no longer inducible from the PVs. CONCLUSION: Epicardial PV isolation can be successfully performed by a single-sided robot-assisted approach. The effect of PV ablation on AF is not an all or none phenomenon. Incomplete isolation already decreases AF duration and lengthens the AF cycle length. However, complete isolation is necessary to prevent AF induction by triggering from the isolated area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brakel et al. (2005) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=14). Robot-assisted epicardial microwave ablation vs. Baseline control was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation duration (p=0.04). Robot-assisted epicardial microwave ablation decreased AF duration from 6.6 s to 1.3 s after incomplete isolation (P=0.03) and 1.6 s after complete isolation (P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: