Key result
Mitral valve replacement in 5 patients with severe mitral regurgitation reduced end-diastolic volume (193 to 166 ml/m2, p<0.05), but 3 patients died suddenly at 3.3 years.
Why the study?
Does mitral valve replacement improve clinical outcomes and ventricular parameters in patients with mitral regurgitation and a severely dilated left ventricle?
Observational (n=5)
Does mitral valve replacement improve clinical outcomes and ventricular parameters in patients with mitral regurgitation and a severely dilated left ventricle?
Absolute Event Rate: 166% vs 193%
p-value: p=<0.05
Mitral valve replacement in patients with severe end-stage heart disease and mitral regurgitation provides temporary symptomatic relief and reduces end-diastolic volume, but is associated with poor long-term survival.
May reduce LVEDV short-term yet confer high sudden death risk; leaves open whether isolated MVR benefits end-stage MR with severe LV dilation.
Mitral regurgitation is a significant complication of end-stage cardiomyopathy, and its existence predicts poor survival. In general, it is thought that mitral valve replacement (MVR) alone is ineffective; however, there are few detailed reports of the clinical course of patients who have undergone MVR. Five patients with mitral regurgitation whose preoperative left ventricular end-systolic volume index was more than 100 ml/m2 were studied. Although their prognosis late after MVR became poor, none of them died within 30 days of the operation. Postoperative cardiac catheterization was performed 6.3+/-1.1 months after surgery; the end-diastolic volume had reduced (before: 193+/-26 ml/m2; after: 166+/-34 ml/m2, p<0.05), but the end-systolic volume had not (before: 110+/-7 ml/m2; after: 112+/-32 ml/m2). The end-systolic wall stress was substantially elevated preoperatively (238+/-29 kdyne/cm2) and tended to increase after surgery (295+/-96 kdyne/cm2). All the patients were able to return to work at some stage postoperatively (their New York Heart Association functional class improved to I or II), but 3 of the 5 patients died suddenly of heart failure at 3.3+/-1.6 years after surgery and the New York Heart Association functional class of the others worsened to III again. Mitral valve surgery, including MVR, can manage severe end-stage heart disease with mitral regurgitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirata et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Mitral regurgitation and dilated left ventricle (n=5). Mitral valve replacement vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on End-diastolic volume (ml/m2) (p=<0.05). Mitral valve replacement in 5 patients with severe mitral regurgitation reduced end-diastolic volume (193 to 166 ml/m2, p<0.05), but 3 patients died suddenly at 3.3 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: