Why the study?
Does rabbit coronavirus infection cause dilated cardiomyopathy in a rabbit model?
Does rabbit coronavirus infection cause dilated cardiomyopathy in a rabbit model?
Rabbit coronavirus infection can progress to dilated cardiomyopathy, providing a useful experimental model for studying the disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports rabbit coronavirus as experimental model for post-viral cardiomyopathy; leaves open human translation.
A rabbit model for coronavirus-induced dilated cardiomyopathy is described. Acute rabbit coronavirus infection results in virus-induced myocarditis and congestive heart failure. Of the survivors of rabbit coronavirus infection, 41% had increased heart weight and heart weight-tobody weight ratios, biventricular dilation, myocyte hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, and myocarditis consistent with the development of dilated cardiomyopathy. These changes were also seen in the remaining 59% of the survivors, except that the degree of myocyte hypertrophy was reduced and only right ventricular dilation was present. In most survivors, myocarditis was usually mild (1-5 foci/transverse section), but in some cases it was severe (>20 foci/transverse section). Interstitial and replacement fibrosis was more pronounced in the papillary muscles. These data suggest that rabbit coronavirus infection may progress to dilated cardiomyopathy. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a debilitating chronic illness with an incidence of --0.73-7.5 casesflOO,OOO population/year in developed countries [1]. In developing countries, this number is probably significantly higher [1]. DCM is characterized by a grossly enlarged heart, ventricular dilation, and low ejection fractions that can frequently result in the formation of ventricular thrombi. Histologic examination reveals myocyte hypertrophy, fibrosis, and occasionally myocarditis The 2-to 3-year survival rate of a patient with DCM is --50% [4], with death frequently occurring from chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) and to a lesser extent from ventricular arrhythmias or pulmonary or peripheral emboli
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: