Why the study?
Does the A&D TM-2430 upper-arm blood pressure monitor provide accurate ambulatory blood pressure measurements in children and adolescents compared to manual observer measurements?
Does the A&D TM-2430 upper-arm blood pressure monitor provide accurate ambulatory blood pressure measurements in children and adolescents compared to manual observer measurements?
The A&D TM-2430 upper-arm BP monitor meets BHS standards and is validated for ambulatory BP monitoring in children and adolescents.
Supports accuracy for pediatric ambulatory monitoring; extends adult validation data but leaves broader outcome studies open.
OBJECTIVE: The A&D TM-2430 ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitor has been validated in adults but not in a young population. We sought to validate the device monitoring in children and adolescents, according to the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol. METHODS: The A&D TM-2430 is an automated oscillometric upper-arm device for ambulatory BP monitoring. Nine consecutive measurements were taken in 61 children (mean age, 9.8 years; range, 5-15 years) according to the BHS criteria. Overseen by an independent supervisor, measurements were recorded by two observers blinded from each other's readings and from the device readings. RESULTS: The mean difference ± SD between the observers and device measurements was 0.73 ± 1.64 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and -1.23 ± 1.65 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP), respectively, with an interobserver difference of 4 mmHg. The cumulative percentages of differences within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg were 89, 95, and 98% for SBP and 67, 88, and 98% for DBP. The device achieved a grade A rating for SBP and a B grade for DBP. CONCLUSION: The A&D TM-2430 upper-arm BP monitor has fulfilled the required BHS standards and can be recommended for measuring ambulatory BP in children and adolescent populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yip et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: