The estimated thrombotic risk of 1 in 400-500 for pregnant women with the factor V(Leiden) mutation does not support routine screening in early pregnancy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low prevalence of Factor V(Leiden) in PA-VTE may not warrant routine screening; challenges proposals for universal pregnancy testing.
In an attempt to reduce the incidence of pregnancy associated venous thromboembolism (PA-VTE), some researchers have advocated screening of all women for the factor V(Leiden) mutation during early pregnancy. We have conducted a large retrospective study (over 72,000 deliveries) to determine if this would be useful. Sixty-two objectively confirmed venous thrombotic events (51 DVT, 11 PE) were recorded at two maternity units in the UK. The incidence of DVT was 0.71 per 1000 deliveries (95% CI 0.5-0.9) with 0.50 occurring in the antenatal period (95% CI 0.34-0.66) and 0.21 in the puerperium (95% CI 0.11-0.31). The incidence of PE was 0.15 per 1000 deliveries (95% CI 0.06-0.24), 0.07 antenatal (95% CI 0.01-0.13) and 0.08 in the puerperium (95% CI 0.02-0.14). Of these 62, 50 attended for follow-up and thrombophilia screening. 28% of all episodes of PA-VTE had no clinical risk factor for thrombosis or an identifiable thrombophilic abnormality. Deficiency of antithrombin was identified in 12% of individuals (95% CI 3-21) and the factor V(Leiden) mutation in 8% (95% CI 0.5-15.5). Based on estimates of the prevalence of the factor V(Leiden) mutation in the population, we estimate that the thrombotic risk for a woman during pregnancy or the puerperium with the defect is approximately 1 in 400-500. This figure would not lend support to the idea of random screening for the mutation in early pregnancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McColl et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: