Why the study?
Does long-term ouabain treatment impair vascular function in resistance arteries in male Wistar rats?
Does long-term ouabain treatment impair vascular function in resistance arteries in male Wistar rats?
Long-term ouabain treatment induces hypertension and, over 20 weeks, causes vascular dysfunction in resistance arteries mediated by COX-2, oxidative stress, and inflammation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Long-term ouabain may impair rat resistance artery function via COX-2 pathways; extends prior data but leaves open human relevance.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to examine the cardiovascular effects of long-term ouabain treatment at different time points. METHODS: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured by tail-cuff method in male Wistar rats treated with ouabain (approx. 8.0 μg·day(-1)) or vehicle for 5, 10 and 20 weeks. Afterwards, vascular function was assessed in mesenteric resistance arteries (MRA) using a wire myograph. ROS production and COX-1 and COX-2, TNF-α, and IL-6 protein expression were investigated. RESULTS: SBP was increased by ouabain treatment up to the 6th week and remained stable until the 20th week. However, noradrenaline-induced contraction increased only in MRA in rats treated with ouabain for 20 weeks. NOS inhibition and endothelium removal increased the noradrenaline response, but to a smaller magnitude in MRA in the ouabain group. Moreover, inhibition of COX-2 or incubation with superoxide dismutase restores noradrenaline-induced contraction in the 20-week ouabain group to control levels. ROS production as well as COX-2, IL-6 and TNF-α protein expression increased in MRA in this group. CONCLUSION: Although ouabain treatment induced hypertension in all groups, a larger noradrenaline induced contraction was observed over 20 weeks of treatment. This vascular dysfunction was related to COX-2-derived prostanoids and oxidative stress, increased pro- inflammatory cytokines and reduced NO bioavailability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wenceslau et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: