Why the study?
Does long-term ouabain treatment affect blood pressure and aortic contractile responses in male Sprague-Dawley rats?
Does long-term ouabain treatment affect blood pressure and aortic contractile responses in male Sprague-Dawley rats?
Long-term ouabain treatment in rats alters ex vivo aortic contractile responses to endothelin-1 and phenylephrine in opposing directions without affecting in vivo systolic blood pressure.
Findings in this rat model should not guide clinical use of ouabain; hypothesis-generating for differential vascular receptor modulation.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats were infused with 50 microg/kg/day of ouabain for 4 weeks to address the question whether prolonged exposure to the drug affects blood pressure, the in vitro contractile responses to agonists and high K+ of their aortae, and the influence of endothelium on these responses. Systolic blood pressure was not affected by ouabain treatment. The responsiveness of endothelium-intact aortae from ouabain-treated rats to endothelin-1 increased, that to phenylephrine decreased, and that to high K+ was unchanged, as compared with control. The responses of endothelium-free aortae to endothelin-1, phenylephrine, and high K+ were lower in ouabain-treated than in control rats. The removal of endothelium increased the response to phenylephrine and decreased that to high K+ in either control or ouabain-treated rat aortae, whereas it did not affect the response to endothelin-1 in control rat aortae and decreased it in ouabain-treated rat aortae. The response to caffeine was unaffected by either ouabain treatment or endothelium removal. Thus rat ouabain long-term treatment induces opposing effects on the responsiveness of their intact aortae to an alpha-adrenergic agonist and endothelin-1. If these effects observed in the ex vivo experiments occur also in vivo on rat microvasculature, they could balance out and contribute to the lack of effect on systolic blood pressure of prolonged ouabain treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cargnelli et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: