Key result
Mean platelet volume was not significantly associated with the presence of good versus poor coronary collateral vessels in patients with acute coronary syndromes (11.01 vs 10.74 fl; P=0.421).
Why the study?
Does mean platelet volume predict the presence of coronary collateral vessels in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Observational (n=180)
Does mean platelet volume predict the presence of coronary collateral vessels in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Mean platelet volume on admission does not predict the development of coronary collateral vessels or the number of involved vessels in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
MPV does not predict coronary collaterals in ACS; leaves open whether other platelet indices warrant prospective study.
Background: Elevated mean platelet volume (MPV) has been proposed as a risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) and is associated with poor clinical outcome in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, some studies have contradictory findings. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the association of MPV with the presence of coronary collateral vessel (CCV) in patients with ACS. Objective: To find MPV value in ACS patients and to find the predictive value of MPV in the spectrum of CAD and to examine whether levels of MPV predict the presence of CCVs. Methods: A total of 180 patients with first ACS were included in the study. MPV was measured. All patients underwent coronary angiography to know disease severity and CCVs. The CCVs are graded according to the Rentrop scoring system and according to coronary angiography results; patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (poor CCV) and Group 2 (good CCV). Results: The MPV was 10.74 ± 2 fl in poor collateral group patients and 11.01 ± 1.7 fl in good collateral group (P = 0.421). The presence of CCV was not significantly associated with high levels of MPV. MPV value did not show any prediction of the spectrum of CAD. Conclusion: MPV on admission was not associated with the development of CCV positively in patients with ACS. Furthermore, it is not associated with a number of vessel involvements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singhal et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndromes (n=180). Good coronary collateral vessels vs. Poor coronary collateral vessels was evaluated on Mean platelet volume (p=0.421). Mean platelet volume was not significantly associated with the presence of good versus poor coronary collateral vessels in patients with acute coronary syndromes (11.01 vs 10.74 fl; P=0.421).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: