Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this work, I challenge some of the ideas presented by Antony Duff's in his book The Realm of Criminal Law and, more particularly, his approach to the idea of "public wrongs." I claim that his views on the subject unjustifiably put into question some shared ideas about what it means to live in a democratic and multicultural society. More particularly, I maintain that, in multicultural societies, we define the basic elements of our identities in dialogue with different and "significant others," which -I submit-makes it difficult to identify public wrongs that are -in his words-"clearly inconsistent with any remotely plausible conception of civil order". In my opinion, many of the problems that I find in his views originate in Duff's implausible understanding of democracy: the "voice of the community" -I claim-can and should only be expressed by the community itself, through an ongoing and unending collective conversation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberto Gargarella (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: