Key result
Eight weeks of interval training improved aerobic peak power output by 4% in ACE I-allele carriers but not in non-carriers, demonstrating genotype-specific adaptations to exercise.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the ACE-I/D genotype is associated with variability in the effects of interval-type training on peripheral muscle performance, cardiovasculature, and post-exercise recovery.
Does the ACE-I/D genotype modulate improvements in cardiorespiratory function and muscle performance following 8 weeks of interval-type training in healthy subjects?
Population
9 healthy subjects
Comparison
Interval training effects compared between carriers and non-carriers of the ACE I-allele
Design
Single-arm pre-post training study
Authors
Loading...
ACE I-allele may modulate interval training gains; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change exercise prescriptions.
Cohort (n=9)
Does the ACE-I/D genotype modulate improvements in cardiorespiratory function and muscle performance following 8 weeks of interval-type training in healthy subjects?
The ACE-I/D genotype modulates physiological adaptations to interval training, with I-allele carriers showing distinct improvements in aerobic peak power and muscle perfusion compared to non-carriers.
Gasser et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Healthy subjects (n=9). Interval training on a soft robotic device vs. ACE I-allele non-carriers was evaluated on Peak anaerobic and aerobic power output, mechanical work, and metabolic stress. Eight weeks of interval training improved aerobic peak power output by 4% in ACE I-allele carriers but not in non-carriers, demonstrating genotype-specific adaptations to exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: