Why the study?
Does Technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigraphy accurately diagnose myocardial infarction in patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with cardioversion?
Does Technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigraphy accurately diagnose myocardial infarction in patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with cardioversion?
False-positive technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scans are infrequent after CPR and electrical cardioversion, preserving the test's diagnostic value for myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scintigraphy retains diagnostic accuracy after CPR and cardioversion; extends evidence to resuscitated patients but needs prospective validation.
Thirty consecutive patients underwent technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigraphy 48--72 hours after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation and direct current cardioversion. Five patients with transmural myocardial infarctions by ECG and enzyme determinations were correctly identified by scintigraphy. Myocardial scans were positive in five of nine patients with nontransmural infarction. Of 16 patients without evidence of myocardial infarction, only two (13%) had false-positive myocardial scans. The overall accuracy of imaging in this series was 80%. We conclude that false-positive scans after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with electrical cardioversion are infrequent, and do not significantly detract from the value of myocardial scintigraphy in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davison et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: