Key result
The 3D PISA method accurately quantified tricuspid regurgitation, showing strong correlation with the 3D VCA reference method for effective regurgitant orifice area (r=0.83, P<0.001).
Why the study?
The study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and accuracy of the 3D PISA method in quantifying tricuspid regurgitation and explore its clinical value.
Does the 3D PISA method accurately quantify tricuspid regurgitation compared to the 3D VCA method in patients with more than mild TR?
Observational (n=54)
Does the 3D PISA method accurately quantify tricuspid regurgitation compared to the 3D VCA method in patients with more than mild TR?
The 3D PISA method provides an accurate, reproducible, and less time-consuming alternative to 3D VCA for quantifying tricuspid regurgitation, including eccentric jets.
May support 3D PISA use for TR quantification; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: Recently, three-dimensional proximal isovelocity surface area (3D PISA) method has already been widely used in tricuspid regurgitation assessment. This study attempts to demonstrate the feasibility and accuracy of 3D PISA quantifying tricuspid regurgitation and explore the clinical value of 3D PISA in quantifying tricuspid regurgitation. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with more than mild tricuspid regurgitation (TR) were enrolled. Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and regurgitant volume (Rvol) were assessed by transthoracic 3D PISA method and three-dimensional vena contracta area (3D VCA) method. The 3D VCA was used as reference method. We analyzed the correlation and differences of EROA between 3D PISA method and the reference method. RESULTS: Both EROA and Rvol assessed by the 3D PISA had good correlations with the reference method, particularly in the assessment of eccentric jets, with the correlation coefficients of r (EROA) = 0.83, P < 0.001, r (Rvol) = 0.90, P < 0.001, respectively. 3D PISA method had good agreement with 3D VCA method in grading TR. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement were also good. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional proximal isovelocity surface area method can accurately quantify the degree of tricuspid regurgitation with good repeatability and shorter time-consuming, which is worthy of further study. 3D PISA method is expected to be a new method for evaluating tricuspid regurgitation in clinic practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Tricuspid regurgitation (n=54). Three-dimensional proximal isovelocity surface area (3D PISA) method vs. Three-dimensional vena contracta area (3D VCA) method was evaluated on Correlation of effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and regurgitant volume (Rvol) (r=0.83 (EROA), r=0.90 (Rvol), p=<0.001). The 3D PISA method accurately quantified tricuspid regurgitation, showing strong correlation with the 3D VCA reference method for effective regurgitant orifice area (r=0.83, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: