Why the study?
NAFLD and HFpEF share common risk factors and are thought to be mechanistically linked, but the serum metabolites associated with HFpEF in NAFLD to identify common mechanisms were undefined.
Are specific serum metabolites associated with the presence of HFpEF in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD?
Are specific serum metabolites associated with the presence of HFpEF in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD?
In patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, HFpEF is associated with alterations in serum metabolites, particularly increased levels of lipid metabolites, suggesting a potential mechanistic link.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No metabolites remained significant after adjustment in this NAFLD cohort; leaves open lipid pathways for prospective validation.
Background Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) share common risk factors, including obesity and diabetes. They are also thought to be mechanistically linked. The aim of this study was to define serum metabolites associated with HFpEF in a cohort of patients with biopsy‐proven NAFLD to identify common mechanisms. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective, single‐center study of 89 adult patients with biopsy‐proven NAFLD who had transthoracic echocardiography performed for any indication. Metabolomic analysis was performed on serum using ultrahigh performance liquid and gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. HFpEF was defined as ejection fraction >50% plus at least 1 echocardiographic feature of HFpEF (diastolic dysfunction, abnormal left atrial size) and at least 1 heart failure sign or symptom. We performed generalized linear models to evaluate associations between individual metabolites, NAFLD, and HFpEF. Thirty‐seven out of 89 (41.6%) patients met criteria for HFpEF. A total of 1151 metabolites were detected; 656 were analyzed after exclusion of unnamed metabolites and those with >30% missing values. Fifty‐three metabolites were associated with the presence of HFpEF with unadjusted P value <0.05; none met statistical significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The majority (39/53, 73.6%) were lipid metabolites, and levels were generally increased. Two cysteine metabolites (cysteine s‐sulfate and s‐methylcysteine) were present at significantly lower levels in patients with HFpEF. Conclusions We identified serum metabolites associated with HFpEF in patients with biopsy‐proven NAFLD, with increased levels of multiple lipid metabolites. Lipid metabolism could be an important pathway linking HFpEF to NAFLD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wegermann et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: