Key result
Compared to non-OHCA patients, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular death (RR 4.6).
Why the study?
The study was designed to appraise the burden of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity among patients undergoing PCI after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest carry a higher risk of mortality and morbidity compared to PCI in non-OHCA patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=301,902)
Does percutaneous coronary intervention after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest carry a higher risk of mortality and morbidity compared to PCI in non-OHCA patients?
Relative Risk: 4.6 (95% CI 1.1–19)
p-value: p=0.033
Patients undergoing PCI after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have significantly higher mortality, ischemic, and bleeding complications compared to non-OHCA patients.
OHCA patients face markedly higher post-PCI mortality; confirms substantially elevated risks versus non-OHCA cases.
AIMS: The aim of this meta-analysis was to appraise the burden of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a meta-analysis of studies assessing the cardiovascular mortality or at least one other pre-defined outcome in OHCA patients undergoing PCI. Forty-nine studies with a total of 301,902 patients (73,634 OHCA and 228,268 non-OHCA patients) were included. Compared to non-OHCA patients, all-cause mortality was higher in OHCA patients (29% vs 4%). The cause of 39% of deaths among OHCA patients was cardiovascular: PCI was more frequently unsuccessful (9.2% vs 7.6%) and there were higher rates of stent thrombosis (2.9% vs 0.8%), myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 1.4%), relevant bleeding (10.2% vs 2.1%) and stroke (1.7% vs 0.5%). OHCA patients compared to non-OHCA patients had a higher risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 6.4, 95% CI: 5.5-7.4), cardiovascular death (4.6, 1.1-19), unsuccessful coronary revascularisation (1.4, 1.1-1.7), stent thrombosis (3.8, 0.6-22.7), myocardial infarction (1.4, 1.1-1.7), relevant bleeding (3.2, 2.5-4.1) and stroke (3.1, 2.3-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: Almost one third of OHCA patients undergoing PCI die and more than one third of the fatalities are attributable to cardiovascular causes. The burden of ischaemic and bleeding complications was consistently higher and the success rates of PCI lower among OHCA as compared to non-OHCA patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spirito et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=301,902). Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) vs. Non-OHCA patients (acute coronary syndrome without OHCA) was evaluated on Cardiovascular death (RR 4.6, 95% CI 1.1-19.0, p=0.033). Compared to non-OHCA patients, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular death (RR 4.6).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: