Key result
Descending aortic constriction induced greater prolongation of the left ventricular relaxation time constant than ascending constriction (P < .05).
Population
Seven anesthetized dogs
Comparison
Constriction of the descending aorta to elevate… vs Constriction of the ascending aorta
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Does not yet warrant changes in clinical afterload assessment; extends preclinical understanding of loading sequence effects on LV relaxation.
p-value: p=<.05
This preclinical study demonstrates that both the loading sequence and the pressure level at the onset of isovolumic relaxation determine left ventricular relaxation.
Kohno et al. (1996) studied Anesthetized dogs (n=7). Constriction of descending and ascending aortas vs. Baseline / ascending vs descending intervention was evaluated on Left ventricular relaxation (time constant [T]) and aortic end-systolic pressure (p=<.05). Descending aortic constriction induced greater prolongation of the left ventricular relaxation time constant than ascending constriction (P < .05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: