Key result
Accelerated streptokinase infusion significantly increased the rate of successful reperfusion to 62% compared to 38% with the standard regimen (OR 3.77) in patients with STEMI.
Why the study?
Does an accelerated streptokinase infusion regimen improve successful reperfusion in patients with STEMI compared to a standard 60-minute infusion?
RCT (n=100)
Single-blind
Simple 1:1 randomization
No
Does an accelerated streptokinase infusion regimen improve successful reperfusion in patients with STEMI compared to a standard 60-minute infusion?
An accelerated 30-minute streptokinase infusion significantly improves non-invasive markers of successful reperfusion and pre-discharge ejection fraction in STEMI patients compared to the standard 60-minute infusion, without increasing adverse events.
Supports accelerated streptokinase in STEMI; extends RCT evidence for optimized infusion regimens.
Introduction: Timely fibrinolysis for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) reduces infarct size and hence preserves LV function and reduces mortality. Optimal regimen of streptokinase (SK) infusion in such patients is a matter of interest. The current study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of accelerated SK infusion regimen in patients with STEMI versus the standard one. Methods: One hundred consecutive STEMI patients were randomly allocated into one of 2 groups: group I (50 patients) who received accelerated SK regimen (1.5 million units over 30 minutes) and group II (50 patients) received standard SK regimen (1.5 million units over 60 minutes). Efficacy was evaluated non-invasively using clinical (chest pain), ECG (resolution of ST segment) and laboratory tests (earlier and higher peaking of cardiac troponin I). Safety was evaluated by assessment of multiple in-hospital adverse events. Results: Both groups were statistically matched in all baseline criteria. There was a significant difference between both groups regarding each parameter of successful reperfusion in favor of accelerated regimen. When all these parameters were combined, 31 patients (62%) had successful reperfusion in group I versus 19 patients (38%) in group II (P = 0.016). We did not report any significant difference between both groups regarding in-hospital mortality, in-hospital heart failure, major bleeding, hypotension or allergic reaction to SK. Mean pre-discharge ejection fraction was higher in group I than group II (50.9 ± 6.6% versus 47.3 ± 4.6%, P = 0.002). Conclusion: Accelerated regimen of SK infusion is safe and effective method of reperfusion in patients with STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bendary et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=100). Accelerated Streptokinase vs. Standard Streptokinase (1.5 million units over 60 minutes) was evaluated on Successful reperfusion (composite of chest pain resolution, >50% ST-segment resolution, and early peaking of cardiac troponin I) (OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.5-10, p=0.006). Accelerated streptokinase infusion significantly increased the rate of successful reperfusion to 62% compared to 38% with the standard regimen (OR 3.77) in patients with STEMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: