Key result
The smoothness index (SI), but not the trough-to-peak ratio, significantly predicted changes in carotid artery intima-media thickness during 12 months of antihypertensive treatment.
Why the study?
Does the smoothness index (SI) better predict changes in carotid artery intima-media thickness than the trough-to-peak ratio (T/P) during antihypertensive treatment in patients with essential hypertension?
Cohort (n=100)
Does the smoothness index (SI) better predict changes in carotid artery intima-media thickness than the trough-to-peak ratio (T/P) during antihypertensive treatment in patients with essential hypertension?
The smoothness index of blood pressure reduction is a better predictor of carotid artery wall thickness regression than the trough-to-peak ratio or absolute blood pressure changes.
SI may better indicate treatment effects on carotid IMT than T/P; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: It has recently been demonstrated that the smoothness index (SI) (the ratio between the average of the blood pressure changes computed for each hour of the recording and its standard deviation), a new and reproducible measure of the homogeneity of blood pressure reduction by antihypertensive treatment, has evident advantages over trough-to-peak ratio (T/P) in the prediction of the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Therefore we considered it to be worthwhile to compare the ability of SI and T/P to predict changes of the carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) during pharmacological treatment in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: In 100 patients with essential hypertension, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure and carotid artery IMT were measured after 3 weeks of therapeutic wash-out and after 12 months of antihypertensive treatment (calcium antagonists, diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or beta-blockers). The homogeneity of the effect of treatment over blood pressure was evaluated by computing T/P and SI. RESULTS: Twenty-four hour blood pressure was significantly reduced by therapy, while, on average, a small but significant increase in indices of carotid artery wall thickness was observed. However, IMT was clearly reduced in patients with high SI. Statistically significant correlations were observed between changes in indices of carotid artery IMT during therapy and SI. No significant correlation was observed between indices of carotid artery morphology and T/P, basal 24 h blood pressure or changes in blood pressure during therapy. CONCLUSIONS: SI, but not T/P is the predictor of changes in carotid artery wall thickness. The information provided by SI is independent from basal blood pressure values. For carotid artery morphology, the smoothness of blood pressure reduction is even more important than its absolute change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rizzoni et al. (2001) conducted a cohort in essential hypertension (n=100). Smoothness index (SI) vs. Trough-to-peak ratio (T/P) was evaluated on Changes in carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT). The smoothness index (SI), but not the trough-to-peak ratio, significantly predicted changes in carotid artery intima-media thickness during 12 months of antihypertensive treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: