Key result
Single-pill valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone lowers SBP by an additional ~6 mmHg versus dual therapy.
Why the study?
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of a single-pill triple combination of valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone compared with a dual combination of valsartan/amlodipine in patients with essential hypertension.
Does a single-pill triple combination of valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone reduce blood pressure in patients with inadequately controlled essential hypertension compared to valsartan/amlodipine dual therapy?
RCT (n=294)
Double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does a single-pill triple combination of valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone reduce blood pressure in patients with inadequately controlled essential hypertension compared to valsartan/amlodipine dual therapy?
Absolute Event Rate: -22.8% vs -16.7%
p-value: p=<0.0001
A single-pill triple combination of valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone significantly improves blood pressure control compared with dual therapy in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, with an acceptable safety profile.
Supports single-pill triple therapy in uncontrolled hypertension; extends dual-therapy RCT evidence to triple regimens.
PURPOSE: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of a single-pill triple combination of valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone (KDF1901, Valdipine Plus) compared with a dual combination of valsartan/amlodipine (KDF1901-R) in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients (n = 294) with inadequately controlled hypertension after a 4-week run-in phase with valsartan/amlodipine (80/5 mg) were randomized to receive KDF1901 (valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone 160/10/25 mg, n = 147) or KDF1901-R (valsartan/amlodipine 160/10 mg, n = 147) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to week 8. Secondary endpoints included changes in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP), BP normalization rates, and response rates. Safety profile outcomes assessed treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory parameters, and serious adverse events. FINDINGS: At week 8, the KDF1901 group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in MSSBP (-22.8 ± 1.0 mmHg) compared with the dual therapy group (-16.7 ± 1.0 mmHg, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean MSDBP reduction was significantly greater with KDF1901 (P = 0.0006). BP normalization rates (75.9% vs 54.5%, P < .0001) and response rates (73.8% vs 51.7%, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the triple combination group. Overall, the incidence of TEAEs was similar between groups (24.7% vs 21.5%, P = 0.5783), with mild cases of dizziness were most commonly reported. Exploratory ad hoc analyses showed statistically greater changes in sodium, potassium, and uric acid levels with triple therapy, but clinically meaningful extreme electrolyte abnormalities were rare in both groups, and the overall laboratory profile remained acceptable. IMPLICATIONS: This trial reported that the single-pill triple combination KDF1901 significantly improved BP control compared with dual therapy without compromising tolerability. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT07116863.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Lee et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Uncontrolled hypertension (n=294). KDF1901 (valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone) vs. KDF1901-R (valsartan/amlodipine 160/10 mg) was evaluated on Change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to week 8 (p=<0.0001). A single-pill triple combination of valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone significantly reduced mean sitting systolic blood pressure compared with dual therapy (-22.8 vs -16.7 mmHg, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: