Randomized trial evaluates gabapentin's effect on hyperalgesia in older patients undergoing cataract surgery, suggesting improvements in pain management.
Background/Objectives: To evaluate whether gabapentin pretreatment modulates neuronal excitability and attenuates second-eye hyperalgesia in patients undergoing sequential bilateral cataract surgery under monitored anesthesia care with retrobulbar block. Methods: We conducted a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessors at a tertiary university hospital. Patients aged > 60 years undergoing elective sequential bilateral cataract surgeries with a 1-week interval were enrolled. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive gabapentin (100 mg three times daily for 1 week between surgeries) or no pretreatment. The primary outcome was the incidence of hyperalgesia, defined as greater intraoperative pain during the second-eye surgery compared to the first. Secondary outcomes included preoperative anxiety level, intraoperative and postoperative pain score, opioid rescue requirements, and surgeon/patient satisfaction for first- and second-eye surgeries. Results: Sixty-four patients (128 eyes) were included and analyzed (31 per group). Hyperalgesia was lower in the gabapentin pretreatment group than in the control group (4 [12.9%] vs. 17 [54.8%], risk ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.09–0.63, p = 0.001). Maximum intraoperative pain significantly decreased from the first to the second surgery in the gabapentin pretreatment group, whereas it increased in the control group (mean difference [standard deviation], −1.48 [2.14] vs. 0.97 [1.96], p < 0.001). Preoperative anxiety improved similarly in both groups before the second surgery. Conclusions: Gabapentin pretreatment may represent a promising strategy for reducing second-eye hyperalgesia and improving perioperative pain-related outcomes in older patients undergoing sequential bilateral cataract surgery under monitored anesthesia care with retrobulbar block.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Min et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: