Key result
Manual thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduced 30-month mortality compared to stand-alone PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris (adjusted HR 4.61).
Why the study?
Does manual thrombus aspiration reduce all-cause mortality in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=139)
Blind evaluation of end points
Computer-generated random series of numbers
Yes
Does manual thrombus aspiration reduce all-cause mortality in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing PCI?
Thrombus aspiration was associated with lower long-term mortality after PCI for unstable angina; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
The clinical effect of intracoronary thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unstable angina pectoris is unknown. In this study, we aimed to assess how thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention affects in-hospital and 30-month mortality and complications in patients with unstable angina pectoris.We undertook an observational cohort study of 645 consecutive unstable angina pectoris patients who had performed percutaneous coronary intervention from February 2011 to March 2013. Before intervention, 159 patients who had culprit lesion with thrombus were randomly assigned to group 1 (thrombus aspiration group) and group 2 (stand-alone percutaneous coronary intervention group). All patients were followed-up 30 months until August 2015.Thrombus aspiration was performed in 64 patients (46%) whose cardiac markers (ie, creatinine kinase [CK-MB] mass and troponin T) were significantly lower after percutaneous coronary intervention than in those of group 2 (CK-MB mass: 3.80 ± 1.11 vs 4.23 ± 0.89, P = 0.012; troponin T: 0.012 ± 0.014 vs 0.018 ± 0.008, P = 0.002). Left ventricular ejection fraction at 6, 12, and 24 months postintervention was significantly higher in the group 1. During a mean follow-up period of 28.87 ± 6.28 months, mortality rates were 6.3% in the group 1 versus 12.9% in the group 2. Thrombus aspiration was also associated with significantly less long-term mortality in unstable angina pectoris patients (adjusted HR: 4.61, 95% CI: 1.16-18.21, P = 0.029).Thrombus aspiration in the context of unstable angina pectoris is associated with a limited elevation in cardiac enzymes during intervention that minimises microembolization and significantly improves both of epicardial flow and myocardial perfusion, as shown by angiographic TIMI flow grade and frame count. Thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention in unstable angina pectoris patients has better survival over a 30-month follow-up period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yıldız et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Unstable angina pectoris with thrombus-containing lesions (n=139). Manual thrombus aspiration vs. Stand-alone percutaneous coronary intervention was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 30-month follow-up (adjusted HR 4.61, 95% CI 1.16-18.21, p=0.029). Manual thrombus aspiration during percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduced 30-month mortality compared to stand-alone PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris (adjusted HR 4.61).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: