Key result
Piezoelectric brachial PWV shows excellent intra-rater reliability and correlates strongly with standard ultrasound.
Why the study?
Local pulse wave velocity is an emerging non-invasive marker of arterial stiffness enabling site-specific vascular evaluation, but the reliability, reproducibility, and agreement of piezoelectric-derived local brachial PWV with ultrasound needed evaluation.
Is piezoelectric-derived local brachial pulse wave velocity measurement reliable and reproducible compared to standard ultrasound-derived PWV in healthy participants?
Observational (n=35)
No
Is piezoelectric-derived local brachial pulse wave velocity measurement reliable and reproducible compared to standard ultrasound-derived PWV in healthy participants?
Effect estimate: ICC 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97)
p-value: p=<0.001
Piezoelectric-derived local brachial pulse wave velocity is a highly reliable and reproducible method for assessing arterial stiffness, showing strong agreement with standard ultrasound.
BACKGROUND: Local pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an emerging non-invasive marker of arterial stiffness that enables site-specific evaluation of vascular health and early detection of localized vessel stiffening associated with cardiovascular risk. METHODS:In this study, local brachial PWV was measured using two piezoelectric sensors placed proximally and distally along the brachial artery to determine intra- and inter-rater reliability and compare the results with standard ultrasound-derived PWV. The brachial artery was chosen for its accessibility, consistent geometry, and physiological relevance as a peripheral muscular artery sensitive to early vascular changes. Thirty-five healthy participants (17M:18F) underwent local brachial PWV measurements in a controlled environment. Measurements were repeated within the same day (intra- and inter-rater), across different days, and at a six-month follow-up to evaluate temporal reproducibility. Additionally, blood pressure was estimated from the piezoelectric pulse signals, and PWV was normalized to mean arterial pressure (MAP) to examine whether normalization improved repeatability. RESULTS:Intra-rater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.94 [0.91-0.97], CV = 3.0%), while inter-rater reliability was good (ICC = 0.82 [0.76-0.87], CV = 6.0%). Between-day reproducibility remained high (ICC = 0.87 [0.82-0.91]). PWV correlated strongly with ultrasound-derived PWV (R² = 0.79, p < 0.001). Measurements at six-month follow-up demonstrated good temporal reproducibility (ICC = 0.71 [0.67-0.79]). Normalization of PWV to MAP reduced measurement variability. CONCLUSION: Local brachial PWV measurements exhibit high reliability, strong agreement with ultrasound PWV, and consistent temporal reproducibility, particularly when normalized to mean arterial pressure. These findings support the methodological validity and reproducibility of local brachial PWV assessment and provide a foundation for future standardization and clinical evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sudarsan et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Healthy adults (n=35). Piezoelectric-derived local brachial pulse wave velocity measurement vs. Ultrasound-derived pulse wave velocity was evaluated on Intra-rater reliability (ICC 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97, p=<0.001). Piezoelectric-derived local brachial pulse wave velocity measurements exhibited excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC 0.94) and correlated strongly with ultrasound-derived measurements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: