Why the study?
Does the IIM-2010A single-site tonometric method accurately and reproducibly measure pulse wave velocity compared to the standard Complior device in healthy adults?
Does the IIM-2010A single-site tonometric method accurately and reproducibly measure pulse wave velocity compared to the standard Complior device in healthy adults?
The IIM-2010A tonometric method provides a simple, reproducible single-site measurement of pulse wave velocity at the radial artery that correlates strongly with standard two-site measurements.
May facilitate simpler PWV assessment; leaves open outcome validation before clinical adoption.
Pulse wave velocity (PWV), based on two-site measurement, is a well-known predictor of arterial stiffness. Interest focused increasingly on simplifying the PWV measurement results in attempts at determining it at a single site. We aimed to validate a new tonometric method (IIM-2010A) for assessment of PWV at radial artery in healthy subjects <65 years of age. PWV measurements were performed in 46 healthy adults (25 men and 21 women) aged 21–65 years (39.6 ± 15.5 years) using Complior device and IIM-2010A respectively. In a subgroup of 21 humans, the measurements were repeated after 1 week using IIM-2010A with the same protocol. There was a strong correlation between PWV obtained by IIM-2010A and PWV obtained by Complior, as well as between pulse transit time (PTT) measurements (r = 0.79 and r = 0.85, respectively, P < 0.01 for both). Although PTT was significantly lower measured by IIM-2010A, no significant difference was found in PWV. The mean difference of PWV with SD was -0.1 ± 1.2 m/s between two repeated measurements at intervals of 1 week. Bland–Altman's plot indicated no trend for the reproducibility of measurements to vary with their underlying mean value. Intraclass correlation coefficient (= 0.87) confirmed this excellent week-to-week reproducibility of PWV. The method provides a simple, easily-obtainable, and reproducible measurement of PWV in young and middle-aged subjects, and has potential to detect premature arterial aging for the management of primary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: