Key result
Novel PVDF sensor tracks pulse wave velocity with ~90% correlation to SphygmoCor.
Why the study?
Pulse wave velocity is an accepted surrogate marker of arterial stiffness and may be useful for assessing cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients, but comparison of a novel PVDF piezoelectric-based device with a validated device was needed.
Observational (n=190)
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an accepted surrogate marker of arterial stiffness and may be a useful tool for assessing cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. The authors sought to compare a novel polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) piezoelectric-based sensing device for measuring PWV in the arm with a validated SphygmoCor device (AtCor Medical, West Ryde, Australia) in normal and hypertensive patients. They also sought to compare measured PWV in the forearm (brachial-radial PWV [BRPWV]) with values obtained in the carotid-radial segment (carotid-radial PWV [CRPWV]). Under standardized conditions, CRPWV in 108 normotensive patients with both devices was measured. BRPWV was measured with the PVDF device. Identical measurements were made in a group of 82 hypertensive patients before and after optimization of blood pressure control. Mean CRPWV was 8.7 m/s in the normotensive group and 9.4 m/s in the hypertensive group. Mean BRPWV was 9.2 m/s in the normotensive group and 10.3 m/s in the hypertensive group. There was excellent correlation between the 2 devices when comparing individual CRPWV values (normotensive group, R(2) = 0.92; mean bias 0.04 m/s; hypertensive group, R(2) = 0.89, mean bias 0.08 m/s). Correlation was also favorable when measuring changes in CRPWV in hypertensive patients undergoing pharmacotherapy (PVDF -0.52 ± 0.90 m/s vs SphygmoCor -0.53 ± 1.01 m/s; R(2) = 0.81). Measured values for BRPWV were significantly higher than CRPWV values, and this discrepancy was more marked in the hypertensive group. The PVDF piezoelectric device has excellent correlation with the validated SphygmoCor device when measuring PWV. This novel device may have an important role in patients with conditions such as hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morrison et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=190). Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) piezoelectric-based sensing device vs. SphygmoCor device was evaluated on Correlation of carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (CRPWV) between the two devices (R2 = 0.92 (normotensive) and R2 = 0.89 (hypertensive)). The novel PVDF piezoelectric device demonstrated excellent correlation with the validated SphygmoCor device for measuring pulse wave velocity (R2=0.92 in normotensives; R2=0.89 in hypertensives).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: