Key result
Left coronary dominance shows no independent association with severe CAD on CCTA.
Why the study?
Coronary dominance is an important anatomical variant where left dominance may influence clinical and ECG presentations, prompting evaluation of its prevalence and association with disease severity, gender, and ECG findings.
Does left coronary dominance associate with increased coronary artery disease severity or atypical ECG findings compared to right dominance in patients undergoing CCTA?
Observational (n=677)
Image reviewers blinded to clinical outcomes
No
Does left coronary dominance associate with increased coronary artery disease severity or atypical ECG findings compared to right dominance in patients undergoing CCTA?
Odds Ratio: 0.95 (95% CI 0.28–3.29)
p-value: p=0.945
Coronary dominance is an anatomical variant not independently associated with CAD severity, but left dominance may be clinically relevant due to its association with atypical or normal ECG presentations even in the presence of severe circumflex disease.
Coronary dominance should not inform CAD severity assessment on CCTA; leaves open whether left dominance affects ECG interpretation or outcomes in prospective cohorts.
Background/Objectives: Coronary dominance is a key anatomical variant in the interpretation of coronary artery disease and its correlation with electrocardiographic (ECG) findings. While right dominance is the most common pattern, left dominance may influence clinical and ECG presentations. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of coronary dominance using coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and evaluate its association with disease severity, gender, and ECG findings. Methods: A retrospective observational analytical study was conducted including 677 patients who underwent CCTA. Coronary dominance was classified as right, left, or codominant. Disease severity was assessed using CAD-RADS. Demographic, clinical, anatomical, and ECG variables were analyzed. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Right coronary dominance was predominant (89.7%), followed by left dominance (8%) and codominance (2.3%). No significant association was found between coronary dominance and disease severity or gender (p = 0.32). Male gender was significantly associated with severe disease (CAD-RADS 4–5) (p < 0.005). The left anterior descending (LAD) artery was the most frequently affected vessel. In the left dominance subgroup, 72.2% of patients had a normal ECG, with a low prevalence of ischemic findings (3%). Cases of left dominance with severe disease and confirmed acute coronary syndrome were identified. Conclusions: Coronary dominance is not associated with disease severity or gender; however, left dominance represents a clinically relevant finding due to its association with atypical or normal ECG presentations. Its systematic inclusion in CCTA reports is recommended to improve clinical correlation and decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mancilla et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=677). Left coronary dominance vs. Right coronary dominance was evaluated on Severe coronary artery disease (CAD-RADS 4-5) (adjusted OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.28-3.29, p=0.945). Left coronary dominance was not independently associated with severe coronary artery disease (adjusted OR 0.95) after multivariable adjustment, whereas increasing age and male sex were significant predictors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: