Key result
Higher visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability was associated with more cardiovascular events than lower variability in both lower (12.8% vs 10.5%) and higher (16.7% vs 11.6%) mean SBP groups.
Why the study?
Is long-term visit-to-visit SBP variability associated with cardiovascular disease events in hypertensive patients?
Cohort (n=807)
Is long-term visit-to-visit SBP variability associated with cardiovascular disease events in hypertensive patients?
Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients, highlighting the importance of consistent blood pressure control beyond just lowering mean SBP.
SBP variability may flag higher CVD risk in primary care hypertensives; leaves open whether targeting it improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: The current study aims to determine the relationship of long-term visit-to-visit variability of SBP to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a multiethnic primary care setting. METHOD: This is a retrospective study of a cohort of 807 hypertensive patients over a period of 10 years. Three-monthly clinic blood pressure readings were used to derive blood pressure variability (BPV), and CVD events were captured from patient records. RESULTS: Mean age at baseline was 57.2 ± 9.8 years with 63.3% being women. The BPV and mean SBP over 10 years were 14.7 ± 3.5 and 142 ± 8 mmHg, respectively. Prevalence of cardiovascular event was 13%. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, BPV was the predictor of CVD events, whereas the mean SBP was not independently associated with cardiovascular events in this population. Those with lower SBP and lower BPV had fewer cardiovascular events than those with the same low mean SBP but higher BPV (10.5 versus 12.8%). Similarly those with higher mean SBP but lower BPV also had fewer cardiovascular events than those with the same high mean and higher BPV (11.6 versus 16.7%). Other variables like being men, diabetes and Indian compared with Chinese are more likely to be associated with cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION: BPV is associated with an increase in CVD events even in those who have achieved lower mean SBP. Thus, we should prioritize not only control of SBP levels but also BPV to reduce CVD events further.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chia et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=807). Visit-to-visit SBP variability (BPV) vs. Lower BPV was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Higher visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability was associated with more cardiovascular events than lower variability in both lower (12.8% vs 10.5%) and higher (16.7% vs 11.6%) mean SBP groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: