Key result
Nifedipine CR significantly lowered morning home blood pressure compared to amlodipine (131/80 vs 133/81 mmHg, P<0.05) but resulted in a higher morning pulse rate.
Why the study?
Does nifedipine CR reduce home blood pressure more than amlodipine in patients with essential hypertension?
RCT (n=41)
open-label
randomized
Does nifedipine CR reduce home blood pressure more than amlodipine in patients with essential hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 131% vs 133%
p-value: p=<0.05
Nifedipine CR provides slightly better morning blood pressure control than amlodipine in patients with essential hypertension, though it is associated with a marginally higher morning pulse rate.
Small crossover study leaves open relative home BP effects of amlodipine versus nifedipine CR; larger trials needed before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: We developed a new data collection system named i-converter that could transmit data to a website via cellular phone. Using the system, we compared the effects of two calcium channel blockers on the home blood pressure. METHODS: Amlodipine and nifedipine CR were administered to 41 patients with essential hypertension for more than 6 weeks each in a randomized open-label crossover study. The dose of each drug was increased until the home blood pressure reached the target level of under 135/85 mmHg. RESULTS: The morning home systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly lower during nifedipine CR treatment: 133 +/- 10/81 +/- 8 mmHg with amlodipine versus 131 +/- 8/80 +/- 8 mmHg with nifedipine CR, P < 0.05. The morning pulse rate was significantly higher during nifedipine CR treatment (69 +/- 9 beats/min with amlodipine versus 70 +/- 9 beats/min with nifedipine CR, P < 0.05). The evening home blood pressure and pulse rate, however, showed no significant differences between the two drugs (128 +/- 11/74 +/- 7 mmHg and 74 +/- 10 beats/min with amlodipine versus 128 +/- 10/75 +/- 7 mmHg and 74 +/- 9 beats/min with nifedipine CR, all not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Nifedipine CR had a stronger antihypertensive effect than amlodipine during the critical morning period, but the morning pulse rate was higher. Our new data transmission system was effective for collecting precise data on the blood pressure and pulse rate via the internet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryuzaki et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in essential hypertension (n=41). Nifedipine CR vs. Amlodipine was evaluated on Morning home systolic blood pressure (p=<0.05). Nifedipine CR significantly lowered morning home blood pressure compared to amlodipine (131/80 vs 133/81 mmHg, P<0.05) but resulted in a higher morning pulse rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: