Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates effective glucose monitoring in sweat using nonenzymatic electrochemical sensors, suggesting advancements in biosensor technology.
= 0.9844), and a lower limit of detection of 135.39 μM. For glucose sensing, the redox couple Cu(II)/Cu(III) oxidizes glucose to gluconolactone and subsequently to gluconic acid, producing an oxidation current in an alkaline environment. Our sensors showed excellent repeatability and stability (remaining stable for over a year) with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 2.48% and 4.17%, respectively, for 1 mM glucose. The selectivity, when tested with common interferants found in human sweat and blood, showed an RSD of 4.32%. We hope that the electrocatalytic efficacy of the thermally grown CuNOx sensors for glucose sensing can introduce new avenues in the fabrication of sweat glucose sensors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alam et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: