Key result
A gyroscope-assisted approach for motion artifact cancellation in wearable PPG sensors exhibited better heart rate estimation performance than an accelerometer-assisted approach during walking.
Why the study?
Does a gyroscope-assisted approach improve heart rate estimation performance compared to an accelerometer-assisted approach in wearable PPG sensors?
Population
24 subjects
Comparison
Gyroscope-assisted approach for motion artifact… vs Accelerometer-assisted approach
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
May support gyroscope use in wearable PPG design during activity; leaves open clinical validation and outcome impact.
Does a gyroscope-assisted approach improve heart rate estimation performance compared to an accelerometer-assisted approach in wearable PPG sensors?
Using a gyroscope rather than an accelerometer for motion artifact cancellation in wearable PPG sensors improves heart rate estimation accuracy during exercise.
Lee et al. (2018) studied this question. Gyroscope-assisted motion artifact cancellation vs. Accelerometer-assisted motion artifact cancellation was evaluated on Heart rate estimation performance. A gyroscope-assisted approach for motion artifact cancellation in wearable PPG sensors exhibited better heart rate estimation performance than an accelerometer-assisted approach during walking.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: