Key result
Simvastatin lowered left ventricular end diastolic pressure (18 vs 25 mm Hg, p<0.05) and preserved NO-dependent coronary vasodilation in dogs with pacing-induced heart failure.
Why the study?
Does simvastatin improve NO production and hemodynamics in dogs with pacing-induced heart failure?
Population
Dogs (n=17) instrumented for measurement of coronary blood flow and LVEDP, with pacing-induced heart failure
Comparison
Simvastatin 20 mg/kg/day orally from the 10th… vs Pacing-induced heart failure without simvastatin…
Design
Preclinical
Follow-up
4-5 weeks of pacing
Authors
Loading...
Does not support simvastatin for HF hemodynamics; leaves open whether NO preservation extends beyond canine pacing models.
Does simvastatin improve NO production and hemodynamics in dogs with pacing-induced heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 18% vs 25%
p-value: p=<0.05
Simvastatin preserves endothelial NO production and bioactivity in a canine model of pacing-induced heart failure, suggesting a potential mechanism for statin benefit in HF.
Jean‐Noël Trochu (2003) studied Pacing-induced heart failure (n=17). Simvastatin vs. Heart failure without simvastatin was evaluated on Left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) at 4 weeks of pacing (p=<0.05). Simvastatin lowered left ventricular end diastolic pressure (18 vs 25 mm Hg, p<0.05) and preserved NO-dependent coronary vasodilation in dogs with pacing-induced heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: