Key result
A novel wireless-frequency-locked-loop-based sensor improved the signal-to-noise ratio by approximately 16 dB compared to a conventional continuous wave sensor at a detection distance of 4 m.
Why the study?
Most conventional continuous wave vital sign sensors suffer from phase noise of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
Effect estimate: 16 dB better
A novel wireless-FLL-based vital sign sensor significantly improves signal-to-noise ratio and enables accurate heart-rate measurement at distances up to 8 meters compared to conventional continuous wave sensors.
Improves feasibility of long-range non-contact vital sign monitoring; leaves open clinical validation before practice adoption.
Most conventional continuous wave (CW) vital sign sensors suffer from the phase noise of the voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO). This work develops a novel wireless-frequency-locked-loop (FLL)-based sensor to overcome this issue. This technology uses the propagation delay of the sensor signal to make the entire sensing circuit and the subject under test (SUT) a wireless FLL. The wireless FLL uses a quadrature-tracking technique to track the phase of the propagation signal and the phase variation that is caused by the vibration of the SUT. This technique thus enables the wireless FLL not only to reduce the phase noise of the VCO but also to sense the vital signs of the SUT. Moreover, the phase-noise reduction of the wireless FLL increases with the sensing distance. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the proposed wireless-FLL-based sensor in vital sign sensing is therefore much higher than that of a conventional CW sensor. The SNR performance of the wireless-FLL-based sensor is further optimized using a highly sensitive VCO. Experimental results demonstrate that the SNR of the wireless-FLL-based sensor is around 16 dB better than that of the conventional CW sensor at a detection distance of 4 m. The SNR enhancement increased by approximately 6.6 dB when the detection distance is doubled. With this SNR enhancement, the heart-rate measurement accuracy of the developed 2.4 GHz wireless-FLL-based sensor is 90.5 % at a detection distance of 8 m.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2020) studied Vital sign sensing. Wireless-frequency-locked-loop (FLL)-based sensor vs. Conventional continuous wave (CW) sensor was evaluated on Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (16 dB better). A novel wireless-frequency-locked-loop-based sensor improved the signal-to-noise ratio by approximately 16 dB compared to a conventional continuous wave sensor at a detection distance of 4 m.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: