Key result
Circadian variation of 12-lead QT dispersion was significant in healthy subjects (35.58 ± 16.48 ms, P<0.0001) and uncomplicated CAD patients, but absent in patients with prior MI or heart failure.
Why the study?
Does circadian variation in QT dispersion differ between healthy subjects, patients with CAD, and patients with heart failure, and how does lead selection affect its measurement?
Observational (n=112)
Does circadian variation in QT dispersion differ between healthy subjects, patients with CAD, and patients with heart failure, and how does lead selection affect its measurement?
p-value: p=<0.0001
Circadian variation of QT dispersion is present in healthy individuals and those with uncomplicated CAD, but is lost in patients with previous myocardial infarction or heart failure, with detection highly dependent on the number of leads analyzed.
Methodological consistency in QT dispersion assessment is essential; leaves open whether observed variation informs arrhythmic risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: QT dispersion is considered an index of spatial inhomogeneity of repolarization duration and increased dispersion of ventricular repolarization is supposed to increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. Circadian variation in QT dispersion was investigated. METHODS: Three different modes of lead selection was used: all 12-leads (QTdisp 12), only precordial leads (QTdisp 6), and one pair of preselected leads (QTdisp 2) in a 24-hour Holter recording every fourth hour each comprising 10 consecutive measurements in 54 healthy subjects, 29 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and 29 patients with heart failure (HF). RESULTS: A significant circadian variation was observed in healthy subjects when modes QTdisp 12 and QTdisp 6 were used (Mean +/- SD 35.58 +/- 16.48 ms; P < 0.0001; and 28.82 +/- 16.02 ms; P < 0.0001, respectively), and in patients with CAD (Mean +/- SD 37.86 +/- 17.87 ms; P < 0.01; and 28.72 +/- 17.06 ms; P < 0.0001, respectively), whereas no circadian variation was observed in QTdisp 2. No circadian variation was observed in patients with HF irrespectively of lead selection. Patients with CAD without myocardial infarction (MI) had a circadian variation in QTdisp 12 (Mean +/- SD 33.13 +/- 14.86 ms; P < 0.05), whereas no circadian variation was observed in patients with MI (Mean +/- SD 40.35 +/- 18.80 ms; P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Circadian variation of QT dispersion was detected in healthy subjects and in patients with uncomplicated CAD, but not in those who had suffered a previous MI and in patients with HF. The number of leads among which selection of the longest and shortest QT intervals took place was critical for the disclosure of circadian variation of QT dispersion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansen et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure (n=112). Circadian variation in QT dispersion vs. Healthy subjects was evaluated on Circadian variation in QT dispersion across different lead selections (p=<0.0001). Circadian variation of 12-lead QT dispersion was significant in healthy subjects (35.58 ± 16.48 ms, P<0.0001) and uncomplicated CAD patients, but absent in patients with prior MI or heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: