Key result
Circulating A-FABP correlated with BMI (R=0.694, P<0.001) but had no independent impact on insulin resistance, inflammation, or hyperandrogenemia in women with PCOS.
Why the study?
Is circulating A-FABP associated with insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism independently of obesity in women with PCOS?
Observational (n=119)
Is circulating A-FABP associated with insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism independently of obesity in women with PCOS?
Effect estimate: R 0.694
p-value: p=<0.001
Circulating A-FABP correlates with obesity markers but does not independently drive insulin resistance or hyperandrogenemia in women with PCOS.
A-FABP may mark IR in PCOS; leaves open causal role in pathogenesis.
OBJECTIVE: Many polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women suffer from adiposity and insulin resistance (IR), which play an important role in the development and maintenance of PCOS. Adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (A-FABP) is mainly expressed in adipocytes, and circulating A-FABP has been associated with markers of obesity and IR. Thus, as observed with other adipose tissue derived factors, secreted A-FABP might be involved in the pathogenesis of obesity-associated disorders such as PCOS. DESIGN: Plasma A-FABP concentrations were measured in 102 non-diabetic PCOS women, and associations with markers of obesity, IR, inflammation, and hyperandrogenism were investigated by correlation and multiple linear regression analyses. The effect of lifestyle intervention on A-FABP was studied in a second cohort of 17 obese PCOS women. RESULTS: A-FABP correlated with body mass index (BMI; R = 0.694, P < 0.001), dual-energy X-ray-absorptiometry (DEXA) fat mass (R = 0.729, P < 0.001), DEXA lean body mass (R = 0.399, P = 0.001), HOMA %S (R = -0.435, P < 0.001), hsCRP (R = 0.355, P = 0.001), and free testosterone (fT; R = 0.230, P = 0.02). Adjusted for age, smoking, and glucose metabolism the association of A-FABP with HOMA %S was still significant (P < 0.001), whereas the associations with fT (P = 0.09) and hsCRP (P = 0.25) were not. Inclusion of BMI into the model abolished the impact of A-FABP on HOMA %S. In BMI-matched PCOS women (n = 20 pairs), neither HOMA %S (P = 0.3) nor fT (P = 0.6) were different despite different A-FABP levels (P < 0.001), and in 17 obese PCOS women undergoing a lifestyle intervention, changes in IR were not paralleled by changes in A-FABP. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating A-FABP was correlated with markers of obesity, but had no major impact on IR, inflammation, or hyperandrogenemia in PCOS women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Möhlig et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (n=119). Circulating adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (A-FABP) was evaluated on Correlation of A-FABP with body mass index (BMI) (R 0.694, p=<0.001). Circulating A-FABP correlated with BMI (R=0.694, P<0.001) but had no independent impact on insulin resistance, inflammation, or hyperandrogenemia in women with PCOS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: