Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MBS-actin retains similar structural properties and ATPase activation capabilities as native G-actin, despite internal cross-linking.
We have investigated various structural and interaction properties of maleimidobenzoyl-G-actin (MBS-actin), a new, internally cross-linked G-actin derivative that does not exhibit, at moderate protein concentration, the salt--and myosin subfragment 1 (S-1)-induced polymerizations of G-actin and reacts reversibly and covalently in solution with S-1 at or near the F-actin binding region of the heavy chain (Bettache, N., Bertrand, R., & Kassab, R. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 6028-6032). The far-ultraviolet CD spectrum and alpha-helix content of the MBS-actin were identical with those displayed by native G-actin. 45Ca2+ measurements showed the same content of tightly bound Ca2+ in MBS-actin as in G-actin and the EDTA treatment of the modified protein promoted the same red shift of the intrinsic fluorescence spectrum as observed with native G-actin. Incubation of concentrated MBS-actin solutions with 100 mM KCl + 5 mM MgCl2 led to the polymerization of the actin derivative when the critical monomer concentration reached 1.6 mg/mL, at 25 degrees C, pH 8.0. The MBS-F-actin formed activated the Mg2(+)-ATPase of S-1 to the same extent as native F-actin. The MBS-G-actin exhibited a DNase I inhibitor activity very close to that found with native G-actin and was not to be at all affected by its specific covalent conjugation to S-1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bettache et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: