Why the study?
Does foot-and-mouth disease vaccine prepared from culture virus provide similar protection as vaccine prepared from cattle-passaged virus in susceptible cattle?
Does foot-and-mouth disease vaccine prepared from culture virus provide similar protection as vaccine prepared from cattle-passaged virus in susceptible cattle?
Virus passaged in culture in cattle tongue epithelial tissue is as effective an antigen as virus passaged in live cattle for the preparation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Culture-derived FMD antigens match or exceed cattle-passaged virus potency in this model; leaves open strain-specific field validation before broader adoption.
In three cattle vaccination experiments, with three strains of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease, it was shown that virus passaged in culture in cattle tongue epithelial tissue was as effective an antigen as virus passaged in cattle. With two virus strains, the virus content of the culture at the peak of infectivity was about the same as that of vesicle epithelium from the tongues of reacting cattle. Variable and less satisfactory results were obtained with the third strain, but one culture passage yielded tissue of sufficiently high virus content for the preparation of vaccine of adequate potency. No modification in the antigenic behaviour of the strains was detected as a result of passage in culture. It is a pleasure to acknowledge the technical assistance given by Mr W. J. Brownsea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henderson et al. (1953) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: