Why the study?
Does rotavirus vaccination impact genotype diversity and hospitalizations in the human population?
Does rotavirus vaccination impact genotype diversity and hospitalizations in the human population?
Continued surveillance is needed to determine if rotavirus vaccines cause a shift in circulating genotypes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continued surveillance is warranted after rotavirus vaccination; leaves open whether vaccines drive genotype shifts beyond natural fluctuations.
Temporal and spatial fluctuations in the genotype distribution of human rotaviruses are continuously observed in surveillance studies. New genotypes, such as G9 and G12, have emerged and spread worldwide in a very short time span. In addition, reassortment events have the potential to contribute substantially to genetic diversity among human and animal rotaviruses. With the recent introduction of the two rotavirus vaccines, RotaTeq and Rotarix, in many countries, it appears that the total number of hospitalizations due to rotavirus infections is being reduced, at least in developed countries that implemented a universal immunization program. However, continued surveillance is warranted, especially regarding the long-term effects of the vaccines. No data analyses are available to clarify whether rotavirus vaccine introduction would allow other rotavirus P and G genotypes, which are not covered by the current vaccines, to emerge into the human population and fill the apparent gap. This kind of data analysis is essential, but its interpretation is hampered by natural and cyclical genotype fluctuations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthijnssens et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: