Why the study?
Foot-and-mouth disease has become endemic in Bangladesh, making a detailed summary of the disease condition imperative.
What is the prevalence and what are the risk factors of foot-and-mouth disease among the cattle population in Bangladesh?
What is the prevalence and what are the risk factors of foot-and-mouth disease among the cattle population in Bangladesh?
The pooled prevalence of foot-and-mouth disease in cattle in Bangladesh is 25%, with higher rates in males, older animals, and during the dry season.
High FMD prevalence in Bangladeshi cattle supports targeted vaccination; meta-analysis leaves open climatic risk factor causality.
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a devastating viral infection of cloven-hoofed animals. The disease turned into an endemic in Bangladesh causing prodigious impairment to the nation’s economy and livestock population. For further usage, developing a detailed summary of the disease condition in Bangladesh is imperative. Hence, this study identified the prevalence of FMD among cattle populations accompanying by potential risk factors and climatic variables. Using the Jamvoi 1.2.27 software, the authors analysed 30 studies for estimating the random model effect function. Based on the meta-analysis, the overall pooled prevalence of FMD was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15-35%). The research professed a significant difference between the prevalence rate of males (33%, CI: 22-45%) and females (26%, CI: 14-39%). Moreover, the study reported a noteworthy line of the tendency for the increasing rate of prevalence in adult and old animals than in young individuals. Furthermore, the results showed high prevalence rates in dry season compared to wet season. Thus, this study will permit the government to implement an immediate control program. Moreover, each data gathered will help the prevention of FMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: